During
the Renaissance women were subject to many limitations within the patriarchal
society, especially elite women in terms of their garments. These limitations
led women to try to conform to both sides of the binary in their dress, as far
as concealing and exploiting. Women’s bodies have been viewed as sinful with a
necessity to be hidden since Adam and Eve in the story of the Garden of Eden,
thus the idea of applying strict regulations on clothing was not born in the
Renaissance. In fact, the seed was planted much earlier.

Continuing
with the idea of sumptuary laws, the same reading for today also describes the
sumptuary laws as, “[attempting] to restrict the sumptuousness of dress in
order to curb extravagance, protect fortunes, and make clear the necessary and
appropriate distinctions between levels of society” (Control theUncontrollable). Instead of spending money on clothing and jewelry, the laws attempted
to curb excessive expenses on women’s garments. However, ironically patriarchs
used their wives to demonstrate their own wealth through these garbs. Playing
on this idea, the idea of hiding and advertising through clothing was seen.
Eleanora of Austria by Joos van Cleve exemplifies the luxury portrayed through
expensive garbs. The fur, the jewels, the green bodice with gold thread, and
jewels adorning her hair all allude to wealth. These touches further solidify
the Queen of France’s status in society.
Despite
regulations and double standards, early moderners found creative ways to subvert
these rules. We learned about one of these techniques during our first church
tour (at Westminster). Since churches were considered sanctuaries so women
could enter them to elude an official enforcing regulations. While comical, the
practice still worked. Through our readings, the gallery, and other tours we’ve
participated in, it has become apparent what a large role clothing played in
gender, among other distinctions.
No comments:
Post a Comment